Path Modeling and Predictive Bias

Keith and Reynolds (1990; see also Ramsay, 1997) have suggested path analysis as a means of assessing predictive bias. Figure 4.1 shows one of their models. Each arrow represents a path, and each oblong or rectangle represents a variable.

Figure 4.1 A path model showing predictive bias. The arrow from Group Membership to Intelligence Test Score represents bias.

The Examiner-Examinee Relationship 85

Figure 4.2 A revised path model showing predictive bias. The arrow from Group Membership to Predictor of School Achievement represents bias.

The path from group membership to intelligence test score denotes bias. Its beta value, then, should be small. The absence of this path would represent bias of zero.

A limitation of this approach is that no true ability measures exist. Thus, a path model could not incorporate true ability unless it was measured by three or more existing variables. Figure 4.2 shows a proposed model that disposes of this limitation. Here, true ability drops out, and a path leads from the predictor, Achievement Test Score, to the criterion, School Achievement. The path from group membership to the predictor denotes bias; as before, its beta value should be small. The absence of this path would, again, reflect zero bias.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Brain Battalion

Brain Battalion

Get All The Support And Guidance You Need To Be A Success At Beefing Up Your Brain. This Book Is One Of The Most Valuable Resources In The World When It Comes To Understanding Your Brain to Come Up With A Battle Plan For Intelligence.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment