Info

"The PPVC/Eigen/PVB comparison is from the simulated data test case illustrated in Fig. 10, SNR = 14.2. Note that the Eigen results are based on 3-valued data while the other algorithms used 2-valued data. The PPVC/ Mixel comparison is taken from Fig. 9 and Table V in [14], SNR = 21.6.

FIGURE 11 A geometric model of tooth dentine and enamel created by collecting MRI data samples using a technique that images hard solid materials [20] and classifying dentine, enamel, and air in the volume data with the PVB algorithm. Polygonal isosurfaces define the bounding surfaces of the dentine and enamel. The enamel-dentine boundary, shown in the left images, is difficult to examine non-invasively using any other technique.

FIGURE 11 A geometric model of tooth dentine and enamel created by collecting MRI data samples using a technique that images hard solid materials [20] and classifying dentine, enamel, and air in the volume data with the PVB algorithm. Polygonal isosurfaces define the bounding surfaces of the dentine and enamel. The enamel-dentine boundary, shown in the left images, is difficult to examine non-invasively using any other technique.

TABLE 4 MRI dataset sources, acquisition parameters, and figure references

Object

Machine

Voxel Size (mm)

trIte1 /te2 (s/ms/ms)

Figs

Shells

Simulated

1.92 x3

N/A

0 0

Post a comment