Source: After C. Ou, et al., Science 256(1992):1165-1171, Table 1.

Source: After C. Ou, et al., Science 256(1992):1165-1171, Table 1.

people who lived within 90 miles of the dental practice but who had no known contact with the dentist). DNA was extracted from white blood cells, and a 680-bp fragment of the envelope gene of the virus was amplified by PCR (see p. 000 in Chapter 16). The fragments from the dentist, the patients, and the local controls were then sequenced and compared.

The divergence between the viral sequences taken from the dentist, the seven patients, and the controls is shown Table 23.9. Viral DNA taken from patients with no confirmed risk factors (patients A, B, C, E, and G) differed from the dentist's viral DNA by 3.4% to 4.9%, whereas the viral DNA from the controls differed from the dentist's by an average of 11%. The viral sequences collected from five patients (A, B, C, E, and G) were more closely related to the viral sequences collected from the dentist than to viral sequences from the general population, strongly suggesting that these patients acquired their HIV infection from the dentist. The viral isolates from patients D and F (patients with confirmed risk factors), however, differed from that of the dentist by 10.7% and 13.6%, suggesting that these two patients did not acquire their infection from the dentist.

A phylogenetic tree depicting the evolutionary relationships of the viral sequences (< Figure 23.20) confirmed that the virus taken from the dentist had a close evolutionary relationship to viruses taken from patients A, B, C, E, and G. The viruses from patients D and F, with known risk factors, were no more similar to the virus from the dentist than to viruses from local controls, indicating that the dentist most likely infected five of his patients, whereas the other two patients probably acquired their infections elsewhere. Of three additional HIV-positive patients that have been identified since 1992, only one has viral sequences that are closely related to those from the dentist.

The study of HIV isolates from the dentist and his patients provides an excellent example of the relevance of molecular evolutionary studies to real-world problems. How the dentist infected his patients during their visits to his office remains a mystery, but this case is clearly unusual. A study of almost 16,000 patients treated by HIV-positive health-care workers failed to find a single case of confirmed transmission of HIV from the health-care worker to the patient.

^ DNA sequences of HIV from these patients are most similar to the HIV sequence from the dentist. He probably infected them.

Disease Control

Web site of the U.S. Center for

0 0

Post a comment